Does Solana Need A DAT Strategy? Exploring Treasury Approaches and Ecosystem Token Investment

The cryptocurrency industry has witnessed a fascinating evolution in how projects and institutions approach treasury management over the past several years. From Bitcoin's straightforward store-of-value narrative to Ethereum's emerging debt trends, the strategic deployment of capital has become a critical discussion point for ecosystem development. Now, as Solana continues to mature and establish itself as a leading Layer 1 blockchain, the question arises: does the ecosystem need its own dedicated approach to treasury and token accumulation strategies?

Top Projects

Lulo

Score: 7,586.13

Bonk

Score: 4,806.12

Sphere

Score: 2,544.42

Moonwalk

Score: 2,026.11

In a recent episode of Lightspeed, Anna Yuan joined the conversation to explore what Solana can learn from Bitcoin and Ethereum's treasury approaches, the complexities of ecosystem token investment, and whether the traditional playbook even applies to a blockchain ecosystem with fundamentally different characteristics and strengths.

The Bitcoin and Ethereum Treasury Paradigm

Bitcoin's narrative around treasury management has proven remarkably effective due to its simplicity and track record. The original cryptocurrency has established itself as a straightforward investment thesis that institutional investors can understand and underwrite without extensive technical knowledge. Companies like MicroStrategy have demonstrated the power of this approach, accumulating significant Bitcoin holdings and seeing their valuations respond accordingly.

The beauty of Bitcoin's treasury story lies in its accessibility. Investors don't need to understand complex DeFi mechanisms or evaluate the technical merits of competing protocols. They simply need to believe in Bitcoin's store-of-value proposition and its historical performance. This simplicity has enabled Bitcoin to attract capital from traditional finance in ways that more complex crypto assets have struggled to replicate.

Ethereum's recent emergence as a treasury asset represents an interesting evolution of this paradigm. While more complicated than Bitcoin's straightforward thesis, Ethereum benefits from its position as one of the oldest and most established cryptocurrencies. Its rich ecosystem of applications and the staking yield available through proof-of-stake have created additional layers of value proposition that sophisticated investors find compelling.

The success of both Bitcoin and Ethereum as treasury assets raises important questions about whether similar strategies could work for ecosystem tokens within platforms like Solana. The answer, as the Lightspeed discussion revealed, is far from straightforward.

The Complexity Challenge for Ecosystem Tokens

When evaluating whether ecosystem token investment strategies translate to Solana's DeFi protocols and applications, the complexity factor immediately emerges as a significant hurdle. Unlike Bitcoin's elegant simplicity, ecosystem tokens require investors to understand multiple layers of technology, economics, and governance before making informed allocation decisions.

The discussion highlighted how current altcoin treasury strategies tend to operate on remarkably simple mechanics. When a project announces a treasury initiative focused on a single asset, investors typically apply straightforward valuation multiples. If a project announces it will buy a certain amount of an asset, investors might value the treasury at 1.3 times that amount. This fragile dance continues because the math remains simple enough for market participants to follow.

Introducing a complex valuation framework involving numerous locked ecosystem tokens with different vesting schedules, utility functions, and risk profiles fundamentally changes this dynamic. The cognitive load required to evaluate such a portfolio may exceed what most investors are willing to undertake, potentially undermining the very market dynamics that make treasury strategies effective in the first place.

This doesn't mean ecosystem token accumulation lacks merit—it simply suggests that the approach may need to differ significantly from the Bitcoin or Ethereum playbook. The mechanisms for acquiring exposure, the timeline for value realization, and the communication strategy to investors all require careful consideration.

Usage-Based Token Acquisition: A DeFi-Native Approach

One of the most compelling alternatives to direct token purchases emerged during the discussion: acquiring ecosystem token exposure through actual protocol usage rather than outright market purchases. This approach aligns incentives more naturally and provides additional benefits beyond simple token accumulation.

Many of Solana's top DeFi protocols run continuous liquidity mining incentive programs that reward users for meaningful participation. A treasury or DAO that uses Raydium for liquidity provision, engages with Drift for perpetual trading, or stakes with Marinade for liquid staking naturally accumulates token exposure as a byproduct of productive activity rather than speculative purchasing.

This usage-based acquisition model offers several advantages over direct buying. First, it ensures that the acquiring entity genuinely understands and values the protocol, creating a more informed holder base. Second, it contributes to protocol metrics that matter—trading volume, total value locked, user activity—rather than simply adding to speculative demand. Third, it often results in more favorable acquisition costs as tokens are earned through incentive programs rather than purchased at market prices.

The contrast with centralized exchange trading is particularly stark. When executing trades through a centralized exchange, treasury managers receive nothing beyond the executed trade. When executing through DeFi protocols on Solana, they potentially receive governance tokens, fee rebates, and other forms of value accrual that compound over time.

The Zero-Bound Problem and Team Commitment

A fundamental concern with ecosystem token investment has historically been the propensity for altcoins to approach zero over long time horizons. This pattern has repeated so consistently across crypto history that investors have developed a healthy skepticism toward long-term altcoin holds outside the very top of the market capitalization rankings.

The discussion identified a crucial factor in this phenomenon: team commitment. Many tokens go to zero not because the underlying technology or protocol failed, but because the founding teams stopped working on the project. The pattern of launching a token, extracting value, and then quietly abandoning development has created a graveyard of once-promising projects.

However, this historical pattern may not accurately reflect the current state of Solana's top-tier protocols. The ecosystem has matured significantly, and many leading teams have demonstrated sustained commitment to building regardless of market conditions. These teams continued shipping features, improving user experience, and growing their user bases through bear markets and bull markets alike.

When evaluating ecosystem token exposure, distinguishing between projects with genuine long-term commitment and those seeking short-term extraction becomes paramount. The presence of continued development activity, meaningful roadmap execution, and genuine user growth serves as important signals that a project may break from the historical altcoin pattern.

The Emergence of Professional Governance

Perhaps most significantly, the discussion highlighted how Solana's leading protocols are beginning to exhibit governance characteristics more commonly associated with public companies than early-stage crypto projects. This maturation represents a meaningful shift in how investors might approach ecosystem token valuation.

Healthy succession planning and leadership transitions demonstrate organizational resilience that extends beyond any single founder. When a protocol can successfully navigate the departure or reduced involvement of original founders while maintaining growth and innovation, it signals a level of institutional robustness that traditional investors find reassuring.

Professional management teams stepping up to lead protocol development represent another positive signal. These individuals bring experience in scaling organizations, managing complex stakeholder relationships, and executing long-term strategic initiatives. Their presence reduces key-person risk and suggests that protocols can persist and thrive across multiple leadership generations.

The combination of corporate governance practices with the unique advantages of blockchain-based organization creates an interesting hybrid model. Protocols can maintain the transparency and community involvement that crypto enables while also incorporating the professional management practices that have proven effective in traditional business contexts.

Revenue, User Growth, and Token Value Maintenance

The relationship between protocol fundamentals and token value has become increasingly direct as the crypto market matures. During earlier market cycles, speculation and narrative often overwhelmed fundamental considerations in determining token prices. While these factors remain important, sustained revenue generation and user base growth now play larger roles in supporting token valuations.

When evaluating Solana ecosystem tokens for potential treasury exposure, these fundamental metrics provide a framework for assessment that goes beyond pure speculation. Protocols demonstrating consistent revenue growth, expanding user bases, and improving retention metrics present a stronger case for long-term value than those relying primarily on narrative and momentum.

The discussion was careful to note that ecosystem tokens are not equity or securities—they represent a different form of exposure to protocol growth. This distinction matters for legal and regulatory purposes, but it also reflects a genuine difference in the relationship between token holders and protocols. Token value derives from various utility functions, governance rights, and economic mechanisms rather than direct ownership claims on protocol assets or revenue.

Despite these differences, the correlation between protocol success and token value remains strong. As long as a protocol continues growing, generates meaningful economic activity, and maintains its competitive position, reasonable investors can underwrite exposure to its token. The key lies in identifying protocols positioned for sustainable rather than temporary success.

The Rise of Liquid Token Investing

A significant shift in the investment landscape provides context for ecosystem token accumulation strategies: the emergence of liquid token funds as a meaningful category of crypto investment. The discussion noted that liquid funds are now appearing more frequently than traditional venture funds, representing a fundamental change in how capital flows into the crypto ecosystem.

This trend reflects several important developments. First, many protocols have now launched tokens and established track records, creating opportunities for investment that don't require the illiquidity and long time horizons of venture capital. Second, the infrastructure for liquid token management has matured significantly, with better custody solutions, more sophisticated trading venues, and improved risk management tools.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, investors have become more comfortable evaluating tokens based on fundamental metrics rather than purely speculative considerations. The frameworks for assessing DeFi protocol value have evolved substantially, enabling more rigorous analysis and more informed allocation decisions.

For Solana ecosystem tokens specifically, this shift toward liquid investment creates both opportunities and challenges. The increased sophistication of liquid token investors means that protocols must maintain strong fundamentals to attract and retain investment. At the same time, the availability of liquid investment capital creates opportunities for well-positioned protocols to maintain more stable valuations.

What Can Solana Learn from Ethereum's Approach?

Ethereum's emergence as a treasury asset provides useful lessons for the Solana ecosystem, though the applications may not be direct. Ethereum benefits from incumbency advantages that Solana cannot easily replicate—years of history, the largest developer community, and deep integration with traditional finance infrastructure.

However, Solana can learn from the strategic positioning that enabled Ethereum's treasury narrative to gain traction. Ethereum successfully positioned itself as infrastructure—essential underlying technology that powers applications rather than a specific use case. This infrastructure positioning provides durability because investors can believe the technology will remain relevant even as individual applications rise and fall.

Solana has increasingly adopted similar infrastructure positioning, emphasizing its role as a high-performance execution layer for decentralized applications. The success of this positioning depends on continued execution—maintaining the speed, cost, and reliability advantages that distinguish Solana from competing platforms while growing the ecosystem of applications that depend on these characteristics.

The infrastructure narrative also creates natural opportunities for ecosystem token accumulation. Just as an investor in physical infrastructure might also invest in the businesses that use that infrastructure, an investor in Solana can logically extend exposure to the protocols that depend on Solana's capabilities. This connected investment thesis provides a more compelling story than isolated protocol investments.

The Role of DATs in Ecosystem Development

Decentralized Autonomous Treasuries, or DATs, represent one potential mechanism for coordinated ecosystem token accumulation. These entities can pool capital from various sources and deploy it strategically across the ecosystem, potentially achieving benefits that individual actors cannot.

DATs could play particularly important roles in supporting early-stage protocols that demonstrate promise but haven't yet achieved the scale or track record needed to attract significant investment. By providing capital and active support during critical development phases, DATs can help promising protocols survive to maturity.

The governance of DATs presents interesting challenges and opportunities. On one hand, decentralized governance can ensure that allocation decisions reflect broad community preferences rather than narrow interests. On the other hand, effective investment often requires speed and discretion that pure democracy struggles to provide.

Hybrid governance models that combine professional investment management with community oversight may offer the best of both worlds. These models can delegate tactical decisions to experienced investment professionals while maintaining community control over strategic direction and major allocation decisions.

Risk Management in Ecosystem Token Portfolios

Any strategy involving ecosystem token accumulation must grapple seriously with risk management. The volatility of crypto assets generally, and smaller tokens specifically, creates substantial portfolio risk that can quickly overwhelm any fundamental thesis.

Diversification across multiple protocols provides some protection against idiosyncratic risk—the possibility that any single protocol might fail or underperform despite reasonable analysis. However, diversification within a single ecosystem provides limited protection against systemic risks affecting the entire ecosystem.

Correlation management becomes particularly important in this context. Solana ecosystem tokens tend to move together, particularly during periods of market stress. An entity holding positions across multiple Solana protocols may find that diversification provides less protection than expected when broad market movements dominate price action.

Liquidity management represents another critical consideration. Many ecosystem tokens have limited trading depth, meaning that large positions can be difficult to exit without significant price impact. Position sizing must account for these liquidity constraints, and holding periods should align with realistic expectations about exit opportunities.

The Narrative Question: Does Solana Need a Story?

Beyond specific treasury and token accumulation strategies, the broader question of narrative emerged during the discussion. Does Solana need a compelling story comparable to Bitcoin's digital gold thesis or Ethereum's world computer narrative to attract sustained institutional investment?

Narratives serve important functions in crypto markets. They provide cognitive shortcuts that enable quick assessment and comparison. They create community identity that attracts talent and users. They simplify communication with external audiences who may not understand technical details.

Solana has experimented with various narratives over its history, from the high-performance Ethereum alternative positioning to the consumer crypto focus. Each narrative has attracted different audiences and created different expectations. The challenge lies in finding a narrative that is both accurate and compelling—one that reflects Solana's genuine strengths while resonating with the audiences the ecosystem hopes to attract.

The performance narrative remains perhaps Solana's strongest and most differentiated. No other major blockchain consistently delivers the combination of speed, cost, and throughput that Solana provides. For applications requiring real-time user experience or handling large transaction volumes, Solana offers capabilities that simply aren't available elsewhere.

Institutional Considerations and Traditional Finance Integration

As crypto markets mature and traditional financial institutions increase their engagement, their specific requirements and preferences become more important for ecosystem strategy. These institutions often operate under constraints that affect how they can participate in crypto markets.

Regulatory clarity represents one such constraint. Institutions may prefer exposure to assets and structures that have clear regulatory status over those that remain ambiguous. This preference can advantage larger, more established assets and disadvantage smaller ecosystem tokens regardless of their fundamental merit.

Custody and operational infrastructure present another consideration. Institutions require robust custody solutions, clear accounting treatment, and integration with existing systems. Ecosystem tokens that lack institutional-grade infrastructure may be effectively inaccessible to significant pools of capital despite otherwise attractive characteristics.

The Solana ecosystem has made meaningful progress on institutional infrastructure over recent years. Major custodians now support Solana assets, exchanges have listed many ecosystem tokens, and the operational maturity has improved substantially. Continued progress in this direction expands the potential investor base for ecosystem tokens and supports long-term value development.

The DeFi Advantage in Treasury Management

For entities considering ecosystem token accumulation, DeFi-native execution provides advantages that extend beyond simple token acquisition. The transparency of on-chain activity enables stakeholders to verify treasury activities in real-time, building trust through observability rather than reported figures.

The composability of DeFi protocols creates opportunities for sophisticated treasury management that would be impossible in traditional finance. Positions can be collateralized, leveraged, hedged, and restructured through programmable interactions without requiring counterparty relationships or lengthy negotiation processes.

Yield generation through productive DeFi participation can offset the opportunity cost of holding ecosystem tokens. Rather than simply holding tokens and hoping for appreciation, treasury managers can put assets to work earning yield while maintaining exposure. This yield generation can make ecosystem token positions economically attractive even in flat or declining markets.

The risks of DeFi participation must be carefully managed, of course. Smart contract vulnerabilities, liquidity crises, and oracle failures can result in unexpected losses. Sound risk management practices, including protocol due diligence, position limits, and monitoring systems, become essential for any entity using DeFi for treasury management.

Timing and Market Cycle Considerations

The optimal approach to ecosystem token accumulation varies significantly across market cycles. During bear markets, many tokens trade at depressed valuations that may not reflect their fundamental merit. Patient accumulators can build positions at attractive prices, though they must also survive the psychological and financial challenges of holding through extended downturns.

Bull markets present different opportunities and challenges. Rising prices make accumulation more expensive, but they also provide liquidity for position management and create opportunities to realize gains. The increased attention and activity during bull markets can also benefit ecosystem tokens as new users discover and engage with protocols.

The current market environment presents its own specific characteristics that shape ecosystem token strategies. Understanding where we are in the market cycle, while notoriously difficult, provides important context for allocation decisions and position sizing.

Long-term holders who believe in the Solana ecosystem's fundamental trajectory may be less concerned with cycle timing, preferring consistent accumulation regardless of short-term price movements. This approach requires conviction and staying power but can result in attractive average costs over time.

Competitive Dynamics and Ecosystem Health

Ecosystem token accumulation strategies must also consider competitive dynamics within the Solana ecosystem. Multiple protocols often compete for similar market opportunities, and the competitive landscape can shift rapidly as new entrants emerge or existing players innovate.

Portfolio construction should account for competitive risk—the possibility that a held protocol might lose market share to a competitor. Diversification across competing protocols can help manage this risk, though it also dilutes potential gains from backing winners.

The overall health of the Solana ecosystem affects all ecosystem tokens, creating a rising tide that lifts all boats during periods of ecosystem growth. Factors supporting ecosystem health—developer activity,user adoption, application innovation, infrastructure improvement—benefit the entire ecosystem token portfolio.

This ecosystem health consideration suggests that entities pursuing ecosystem token strategies might also contribute to ecosystem development through other means. Supporting hackathons, funding public goods, contributing to open-source development, and other ecosystem-building activities can have positive effects that compound with token holdings.

The Question of Coordination

Perhaps the most interesting strategic question is whether coordinated ecosystem token accumulation could achieve benefits unavailable through individual action. Network effects in crypto markets can create powerful dynamics where coordinated activity accelerates adoption and value creation.

A coordinated approach to ecosystem token accumulation could provide steady buying pressure that supports token valuations during difficult periods. This support could help promising protocols survive to achieve their potential rather than failing due to temporary market conditions.

Coordination could also facilitate productive relationships between token accumulators and protocol teams. Constructive engagement, whether through governance participation, strategic advice, or partnership development, can create value beyond simple capital provision.

However, coordination also raises concerns about centralization and potential for manipulation. The crypto ethos emphasizes decentralization and open markets, and coordinated accumulation strategies must navigate these values carefully. Transparency about activities and intentions can help address these concerns while still capturing coordination benefits.

Building for the Long Term

The ultimate measure of any ecosystem token strategy is its contribution to long-term ecosystem success. Strategies that extract value from the ecosystem at the expense of sustainable development may achieve short-term gains but undermine the very foundation on which their value depends.

Thoughtful ecosystem token accumulation should support rather than exploit the protocols involved. Holding tokens for the long term, participating constructively in governance, and contributing to ecosystem development create aligned incentives between accumulators and protocol communities.

Solana's ecosystem has demonstrated remarkable resilience and continued development despite various challenges over its history. This resilience provides a foundation for optimism about long-term ecosystem token value, though realizing that value requires patience and conviction through inevitable periods of difficulty.

The protocols that will likely maintain value over the long term are those that continue building, improving, and serving users regardless of market conditions. Identifying and supporting these protocols through ecosystem token accumulation represents both an investment thesis and a contribution to ecosystem development.

Conclusion: A Nuanced Approach for Solana

The question of whether Solana needs a DAT strategy doesn't have a simple yes or no answer. The ecosystem can certainly benefit from thoughtful approaches to ecosystem token accumulation, but the specific mechanisms and strategies must account for Solana's unique characteristics rather than simply copying Bitcoin or Ethereum playbooks.

Usage-based token acquisition through DeFi participation offers advantages that align with Solana's DeFi-native culture. Focus on protocols with demonstrated long-term commitment and emerging professional governance provides a framework for identifying sustainable investments. Recognition that ecosystem tokens represent different exposure than equity or securities guides appropriate valuation frameworks.

The maturation of liquid token investment and the emergence of protocols with public company-like governance create a more favorable environment for ecosystem token strategies than existed in earlier market cycles. These developments suggest that well-executed ecosystem token accumulation could contribute meaningfully to Solana's continued growth and success.

Ultimately, the success of any ecosystem token strategy will depend on the continued success of the Solana ecosystem itself. The talented teams building on Solana, the innovative applications serving users, and the robust infrastructure supporting activity all contribute to an environment where ecosystem tokens can maintain and grow value over time. Supporting this ecosystem development—whether through token accumulation, active participation, or other contributions—aligns individual interests with collective success.

Facts + Figures

• Liquid funds are now appearing more frequently than traditional venture funds in the crypto investment landscape, marking a significant shift in capital allocation preferences

• Bitcoin treasury strategies have demonstrated remarkably simple valuation mechanics, with investors often valuing treasuries at approximately 1.3x the announced purchase amounts

• Ethereum has emerged as a treasury asset for institutional investors, benefiting from its position as one of the oldest cryptocurrencies with a rich ecosystem history

• Many Solana DeFi protocols run continuous liquidity mining incentive programs that provide token exposure through usage rather than direct purchases

• The historical pattern of altcoins approaching zero is often attributed to founding teams abandoning projects after token generation events rather than fundamental protocol failures

• Top-tier Solana protocols are beginning to exhibit public company-like corporate governance characteristics, including healthy succession planning and professional management transitions

• Token value maintenance correlates strongly with consistent protocol growth, revenue generation, and user base expansion

• The complexity of ecosystem token portfolios with different vesting schedules and utility functions may exceed investor willingness to perform due diligence

• DeFi-based execution provides advantages over centralized exchanges including token exposure through incentives, fee rebates, and transparent on-chain verification

• Solana's positioning as high-performance infrastructure creates natural opportunities for connected ecosystem token investment theses

Questions Answered

Can ecosystem token investment strategies work the same way Bitcoin treasury strategies do?

Ecosystem token strategies cannot simply replicate Bitcoin's approach due to fundamental complexity differences. Bitcoin benefits from a simple narrative and straightforward valuation—investors understand the store-of-value thesis without technical knowledge. Ecosystem tokens require understanding multiple layers of technology, economics, and governance. When treasury strategies involve complex portfolios of locked tokens with different characteristics, the cognitive load may exceed what investors are willing to undertake, potentially undermining the market dynamics that make simple treasury strategies effective.

Why do most altcoins go to zero over time?

The primary reason altcoins historically approach zero is team abandonment rather than technical failure. Many founding teams launch tokens, extract value, and then quietly stop working on development. This "TGE and buy out" pattern creates a graveyard of once-promising projects. However, this pattern is changing among top-tier protocols that demonstrate continued commitment through market cycles. Teams that keep building regardless of price action, maintain development velocity, and serve users consistently break from this historical pattern.

How can treasuries or DAOs acquire ecosystem token exposure without direct market purchases?

Usage-based acquisition through DeFi participation offers an alternative to direct buying. Many protocols run continuous liquidity mining incentives that reward active users with token distributions. By providing liquidity on Raydium, trading on Drift, or staking through Marinade, entities naturally accumulate token exposure as a byproduct of productive activity. This approach ensures informed holders, contributes to protocol metrics, and often results in more favorable acquisition costs than market purchases.

What signals indicate that an ecosystem token might maintain value long-term?

Key signals include continued development activity regardless of market conditions, meaningful roadmap execution, growing user bases, and emerging professional governance structures. When protocols demonstrate healthy succession planning—where new professional management can step up when original founders reduce involvement—it signals organizational resilience. Consistent revenue growth, improving retention metrics, and competitive position maintenance also support long-term value cases.

Why are liquid token funds becoming more common than venture funds?

The shift toward liquid funds reflects several developments: many protocols have launched tokens and established track records enabling evaluation, infrastructure for liquid token management has matured with better custody and trading venues, and investors have developed frameworks for fundamental token analysis. Liquid investments don't require the illiquidity and long time horizons of venture capital, making them accessible to a broader investor base while still providing meaningful ecosystem exposure.

Does Solana need a specific narrative to attract institutional investment?

While narratives provide important functions—cognitive shortcuts for assessment, community identity, simplified external communication—Solana's strongest positioning remains its performance narrative. No major blockchain consistently delivers the same combination of speed, cost, and throughput. For applications requiring real-time user experience or high transaction volumes, Solana offers unique capabilities. This infrastructure positioning creates durability because investors can believe the technology remains relevant even as individual applications change.

What risks must be managed in ecosystem token portfolios?

Key risks include volatility, correlation, and liquidity constraints. Diversification across protocols provides some protection against single-protocol failure but limited protection against systemic ecosystem risks. Solana ecosystem tokens tend to move together during market stress, reducing diversification benefits. Many tokens have limited trading depth, making large positions difficult to exit without price impact. Sound risk management requires position limits aligned with liquidity, monitoring systems, and realistic expectations about exit opportunities.

How does DeFi provide advantages for treasury management?

DeFi enables transparent on-chain verification of treasury activities, building trust through observability. Composability allows sophisticated management—collateralizing, leveraging, hedging, and restructuring positions through programmable interactions without counterparty negotiations. Yield generation through productive participation can offset opportunity costs of holding tokens. However, risks including smart contract vulnerabilities, liquidity crises, and oracle failures require careful management through due diligence and position limits.