The Next Evolution of DePIN: Separating Real Physical Infrastructure Networks from Crypto Theater

The decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) sector has experienced a wild ride over the past few years, cycling through phases of intense hype, oversaturation, and now, a critical reckoning. As dozens of projects have launched under the DePIN banner, the original meaning of the term has become increasingly diluted, leaving investors and observers struggling to distinguish genuine physical infrastructure protocols from opportunistic ventures leveraging the label for marketing purposes.

Top Projects

Lulo

Score: 7,586.13

Bonk

Score: 4,806.12

Sphere

Score: 2,544.42

Moonwalk

Score: 2,026.11

In a recent episode of Lightspeed, host Jack sat down with Ariel Seidman, CEO and co-founder of Hivemapper, to discuss the current state of the DePIN landscape, the counterintuitive relationship between business fundamentals and token prices, and what it actually takes to build a decentralized network that requires broad geographic distribution. The conversation offered a refreshingly candid assessment of an industry at a crossroads, providing valuable perspective on which projects represent the authentic vision of DePIN and which are merely riding the wave.

Seidman's insights carry significant weight in this discussion. Hivemapper has emerged as one of the most prominent DePIN projects building on Solana, creating a decentralized mapping network that incentivizes contributors worldwide to collect fresh street-level imagery. His perspective on the industry's growing pains, token market dynamics, and the long road to profitability offers a rare window into the operational realities facing DePIN builders.

Defining True DePIN: The Physical Reality Test

The proliferation of projects claiming the DePIN label has created significant confusion in the market about what actually constitutes decentralized physical infrastructure. According to Seidman, the definition has been stretched far beyond its original meaning, muddying the waters for investors and observers trying to evaluate the sector.

When pressed on which projects represent genuine DePIN implementations, Seidman offered a straightforward framework: true DePIN requires physical infrastructure distributed across broad geographic areas. This isn't about assembling server farms or creating virtual networks—it's about deploying actual hardware in locations around the world that serve specific geographic purposes.

"I mean, I know of three," Seidman stated when asked about legitimate DePIN projects. "I think there's Geodnet, which is doing positioning technology. I think there's Helium. There's some kind of competitors to Helium as well. And then there's Hivemapper." The common thread among these projects is their fundamental requirement for widespread physical distribution across diverse locations.

The distinction Seidman draws is crucial for understanding what makes DePIN genuinely novel as a model. Projects that involve server infrastructure or computing resources, while potentially valuable, don't face the same coordination challenges that define authentic DePIN networks. As Seidman explained, "things that exist in the virtual world, in other words, like, hey, I need a whole bunch of servers to assemble those servers—okay, that's great. I mean, I don't want to like, I'm not shitting on them, but that's not physical in nature."

The Geographic Distribution Imperative

What separates genuine DePIN from projects that merely adopt the label is the requirement for broad geographic coverage. This isn't simply about having nodes in different data centers—it's about needing physical presence in countless specific locations that traditional centralized approaches would struggle to reach.

Seidman illustrated this point by contrasting virtual infrastructure needs with physical ones: "It's not like you need a whole bunch of people in LA and then, you know, San Diego and then Orange County, et cetera. It's like, no, you just need like servers. You need a whole bunch in America. You need a whole bunch in Asia. Okay, call it a day, you know?"

For Hivemapper specifically, the value proposition depends entirely on having contributors mapping streets, roads, and locations across the globe. A mapping network that only covers major cities would be of limited utility to customers who need comprehensive geographic data. Similarly, Helium's wireless network derives its value from having hotspots distributed throughout residential and commercial areas where cellular coverage is needed.

This geographic imperative creates coordination challenges that traditional corporate structures cannot easily solve. Hiring employees or contractors in every neighborhood, town, and city worldwide would be prohibitively expensive and operationally complex. Token-based incentive mechanisms offer a potential solution by aligning contributor interests with network growth without requiring employment relationships or direct management.

The DePIN Market Cycle: From Hype to Maturation

The DePIN sector has traversed a familiar crypto market cycle over the past several years, moving from initial excitement through oversaturation and now into a period of reckoning and maturation. Seidman offered a nuanced view of this progression and what it means for the industry's future.

"Initially, like, DePIN was like super hot and then everybody kind of piled into DePIN and then it got watered down and muddied and it was like, what the heck is DePIN actually?" Seidman observed. "And now we're kind of coming out the other side. It was like, wait, what is DePIN? What are the real products? What are the real businesses?"

This maturation process, while uncomfortable for market participants, represents a healthy development for the sector. The proliferation of questionable projects claiming the DePIN label was always unsustainable, and the current reassessment allows legitimate projects to distinguish themselves through demonstrated progress and real customer adoption.

Seidman framed this evolution positively: "I think that's just a maturation process. And I think that's good. And that's healthy for the industry is to go through that phase of maturing and, you know, being very clear in terms of what actually is DePIN and what's not DePIN."

The shakeout currently underway will likely leave fewer but stronger projects standing. Those that have built genuine physical networks with real utility and paying customers will emerge from this period positioned for continued growth, while projects that relied primarily on token speculation will fade away.

The Tokenomics Paradox: Better Business, Lower Prices

Perhaps the most striking element of Seidman's commentary concerned the counterintuitive relationship between business fundamentals and token prices in the DePIN sector. Despite significant operational improvements across multiple metrics, Hivemapper's token price has declined substantially from previous highs—a phenomenon that challenges simplistic narratives about tokenomics failures.

Seidman laid out the case for Hivemapper's improved business performance: "Our cost to produce the map are far lower than they were a year and a half ago, okay, or a year ago, when our token price was much higher." This cost reduction has been dramatic, driven primarily by improvements in the network's hardware devices.

"The Bee has reduced our cost to map and this is not hyperbole by about 90%," Seidman revealed. "So our AWS bills have dropped pretty significantly and they will go down even more as the network basically becomes dominated by the Bee device." The Bee, Hivemapper's latest contribution device, represents a major technological advancement that has fundamentally improved the network's unit economics.

Beyond cost reductions, the business has shown improvement across multiple dimensions. Customer acquisition has accelerated dramatically, with sales cycles shrinking from six to nine months down to 30 to 60 days. Existing customer contracts are expanding, with clients allocating more budget to Hivemapper products. Geographic coverage has expanded significantly. Yet despite all these positive developments, the token price has declined.

Challenging the Tokenomics Narrative

The conventional wisdom in crypto markets often attributes declining token prices to flawed tokenomics—excessive supply inflation, insufficient demand sinks, or misaligned incentives. Seidman pushed back against this narrative with a pointed observation about market consistency.

"People say, oh, it's the tokenomics. Well, when our token price was like 15 cents or 20 cents, nobody was like shitting on the tokenomics back then," Seidman noted. "So I think we have to say and look at it a little bit, you know, with a little bit of intellectual honesty."

This observation highlights an important logical inconsistency in how markets and commentators evaluate DePIN tokens. The tokenomic structures of projects like Hivemapper haven't changed materially between their price peaks and current levels. If the tokenomics were fundamentally sound when prices were higher, they should still be sound now—and if they're flawed now, they were equally flawed then.

Seidman extended this analysis to Helium, another prominent DePIN project that has seen token price declines despite strong operational performance: "Helium has real product market fit in their WiFi wireless product category. I mean, they have AT&T, they have T-Mobile customers, they have subscribers coming on board, you know, in the hundreds of thousands."

Helium's Demonstrated Market Fit

The case of Helium illustrates the disconnect between business fundamentals and market perception in stark terms. The network has achieved genuinely impressive milestones that would be celebrated in any traditional technology company.

"I think they have over a million customers that they're serving every single day," Seidman noted. "So like that's a real business. They have tens of millions of dollars of revenue." These are not speculative projections or theoretical use cases—they represent actual paying customers and recognized revenue.

Despite this demonstrated traction, Helium's token has experienced significant price declines alongside other DePIN assets. This parallel between Hivemapper and Helium suggests the issue may not be project-specific tokenomic design but rather broader market dynamics affecting the entire sector.

The improving fundamentals at both networks make the token price performance particularly puzzling from a traditional investment perspective. "These businesses are improving, getting better, starting to reach scale and that you have the token price is dropping. So something is not quite adding up here," Seidman observed.

Market Narrative and Sector Sentiment

If tokenomics alone don't explain DePIN token performance, what does? Seidman pointed to market narrative as a significant factor—the collective perception and sentiment that drives capital flows into and out of crypto sectors.

"I think a big part of it is just like market narrative, right? It's like, yes, there's been way too many DePIN projects that have launched. You know, many of them, like we're saying before, don't require DePIN at all. You know, many of them don't even have customers at all," Seidman explained.

The proliferation of questionable projects has created a guilt-by-association problem for legitimate DePIN networks. When investors see numerous failures or scams in a category, they tend to paint the entire sector with the same brush, regardless of individual project merits. This sector-wide sentiment can persist even as fundamentals diverge widely between different projects.

This dynamic is particularly acute in crypto markets, where retail investors often make allocation decisions based on narrative and sector rotation rather than detailed fundamental analysis. The DePIN label that once attracted capital flow has become, at least temporarily, a liability that may not reflect the actual progress being made by leading projects.

The Long Road to Profitability: Learning from Uber

Seidman drew an important parallel to traditional technology companies when discussing the timeline for DePIN networks to achieve sustainable profitability. Network businesses, whether decentralized or centralized, typically require extended periods to reach scale and convert that scale into positive cash flow.

"The other thing to remember here is like networks, businesses like an Uber or Lyft for that matter took many, many, many, many years to reach scale and then turn that scale into a cash flow machine," Seidman observed. "You know, you were kind of in the very early phases of these networks starting to grow, reach scale and then start to generate, you know, meaningful revenue and then turn that revenue into meaningful cash flow."

The Uber comparison is particularly instructive. The ride-sharing giant operated for approximately a decade before achieving consistent profitability, burning through billions of dollars in investor capital to subsidize growth, expand into new markets, and build the infrastructure necessary to operate at scale.

"In a case Uber, it was like literally I think 10, 15 years before they started like really generate meaningful cash flow, positive cash flow," Seidman noted. "And I think the same thing will be true in the case of DePIN, right? For those things that are really reaching massive scale, it will take a while for them to reach positive cash flow."

The Uncomfortable Reality of Building at Scale

Seidman's candor about the current market environment acknowledged the genuine difficulty faced by DePIN projects and their token holders. The gap between operational progress and market perception creates real challenges for teams trying to build sustainable businesses.

"Look, I think we're in this phase right now that is very uncomfortable from a market perspective and I get it," Seidman stated. "But if I just look at the businesses themselves, nothing has changed from a tokenomic perspective. You know, from a year and a half ago to now and the businesses are improving."

This "uncomfortable phase" requires projects to maintain operational focus despite external pressure and negative sentiment. Teams that allow market conditions to distract from core execution risk falling behind even as the broader environment eventually improves. The projects that emerge strongest from bear markets are typically those that continued building through adversity.

The key message for observers and stakeholders is that declining token prices don't necessarily indicate declining project quality or prospects. The relationship between short-term market performance and long-term business success can be quite indirect, particularly during periods of broad sector sentiment shifts.

Revenue Generation and Customer Growth

While Seidman was careful to frame DePIN as still being in early stages, he emphasized that leading projects are already generating meaningful revenue and growing their customer bases. This represents a significant evolution from earlier phases where DePIN projects operated primarily on speculative interest without demonstrated commercial traction.

"Now they're generating revenue, we're generating revenue. Our customers, you know, customers are growing with us and, you know, putting, allocating more and more dollars towards Hivemapper network products," Seidman explained.

This revenue trajectory is crucial for the long-term sustainability of DePIN networks. Token-based incentives can bootstrap network growth, but ultimately these projects need to generate sufficient value that customers are willing to pay for their products and services. The transition from speculative asset to revenue-generating business represents a maturation that many crypto projects never achieve.

The acceleration in Hivemapper's sales cycle—from six to nine months down to 30 to 60 days—suggests growing market acceptance of the network's value proposition. Faster sales cycles indicate that customers are increasingly familiar with and convinced by the product, reducing the education and trust-building required to close deals.

The Convergence Question: Tokens vs. Equity

One of the most provocative topics raised in the conversation concerned the potential convergence between crypto token markets and traditional equity markets. This question has significant implications for how DePIN projects might evolve their capital structures over time.

Seidman acknowledged hearing discussions about this possibility within the DePIN community: "I've definitely heard some version of that, right? Like where the token is very important the early days in terms of, you know, exciting and motivating and inspiring people in the kind of like the early speculative phase. And then over time, at least from the contributor perspective, it becomes less critical, right? Because you've reached scale and like it's clearest or real business."

This perspective suggests that tokens serve a specific function in the network growth phase—coordinating early contributors and distributing ownership broadly—but may become less essential once networks achieve self-sustaining scale. At that point, traditional corporate structures might offer advantages for raising capital and rewarding stakeholders.

Seidman was careful to note that he hasn't formed a definitive opinion on whether Hivemapper should pursue such a transition: "I do know that there are other folks that are potentially considering going down that road. I think in the Hivemapper case, I think it's too early to make that decision."

The Blurring Line Between Crypto and Traditional Markets

The broader trend toward convergence between crypto and traditional financial markets provides context for these discussions. Platforms like Robinhood have made it increasingly easy for retail investors to move between crypto assets and traditional securities, breaking down barriers that previously kept these markets separate.

"You're seeing this like, I mean, we're seeing this right now with Robinhood, right? And others that the crypto markets and the stock markets, like the difference between those two things is starting to get a little bit gray," Seidman observed.

This blurring of boundaries has implications for how DePIN projects are valued and how they might structure their capital over time. As the distinction between token investors and equity investors becomes less clear, projects may have more flexibility in choosing capital structures that best serve their operational needs.

"It used to be like there was a crypto market and then there was like a stock market and they were like fundamentally like two totally different things, two totally different, you know, investor bases quite frankly," Seidman noted. "And I think you're starting to see those things kind of, you know, muddy and converge over time."

Solana's Role in the DePIN Ecosystem

While not the central focus of the conversation, the prominence of Hivemapper on Solana highlights the blockchain's position as a preferred infrastructure for DePIN projects. The combination of high throughput, low transaction costs, and a strong developer ecosystem has made Solana an attractive platform for networks that require frequent, low-value transactions.

DePIN networks face unique blockchain requirements compared to other crypto applications. Contributor rewards, data submissions, and network operations generate high transaction volumes that would be economically unfeasible on chains with higher fees. Solana's architecture addresses these requirements effectively, making it a natural choice for projects like Hivemapper.

The success of leading DePIN projects on Solana reinforces the blockchain's value proposition for physical infrastructure applications. As these networks continue to grow and demonstrate real-world utility, they serve as case studies for the viability of Solana as enterprise-grade infrastructure.

The Hardware Innovation Cycle

Seidman's reference to the "Bee" device and its 90% cost reduction highlights an often-overlooked aspect of DePIN development: hardware innovation. Unlike purely software-based crypto projects, DePIN networks must continuously improve their physical devices to reduce costs and enhance capabilities.

The dramatic cost improvements achieved through the Bee demonstrate that DePIN networks can benefit from the same hardware cost curves that have made computing and communications ubiquitous. As devices become cheaper and more capable, the economics of network contribution improve for participants while the cost of maintaining the network decreases for the protocol.

This hardware dimension adds complexity to DePIN projects but also creates potential competitive advantages. Networks that invest in proprietary hardware development can achieve capabilities and economics that competitors would struggle to replicate. The improvement Hivemapper has achieved with the Bee suggests significant ongoing innovation in this area.

Customer Segmentation and Enterprise Adoption

The evolution of Hivemapper's sales cycle from six to nine months down to 30 to 60 days signals an important shift in customer readiness to adopt DePIN products. Enterprise customers typically have long sales cycles when evaluating novel technology vendors, and the compression of these timelines indicates growing market maturity.

Several factors likely contribute to this acceleration. Increased familiarity with DePIN concepts among potential customers reduces education requirements. Demonstrated success with existing customers provides social proof. Expanded geographic coverage makes the product more immediately applicable to customer use cases. And general market acceptance of crypto-native businesses as legitimate vendors improves buyer comfort.

The expansion of existing customer contracts is equally significant. When customers increase their allocation to a vendor over time, it indicates genuine satisfaction with the product and confidence in the provider's future. This type of organic growth often proves more sustainable than acquiring entirely new customers.

The Competitive Landscape for Mapping

Hivemapper operates in a market traditionally dominated by well-funded incumbents like Google Maps. The ability to compete with and potentially displace these established players depends on offering superior freshness, coverage, or cost economics that justify switching costs.

Decentralized contribution networks have inherent advantages in certain dimensions. The ability to incentivize contributors globally can achieve coverage that would be prohibitively expensive to replicate through employed drivers. The continuous nature of contributor activity can maintain map freshness better than periodic update cycles. And the cost structure can potentially undercut centralized alternatives.

However, these advantages must be weighed against the challenges of quality control, data consistency, and brand trust that established mapping providers have built over decades. The path to market leadership in mapping requires not just technological capability but also sustained commercial execution and customer relationship management.

The Broader DePIN Investment Thesis

For investors considering the DePIN sector, Seidman's comments suggest several important considerations. First, the sector label itself has become unreliable as a filter for identifying promising investments. Detailed evaluation of whether projects genuinely require geographic distribution is essential.

Second, token price performance during market downturns may not correlate with underlying business progress. Projects demonstrating revenue growth, customer acquisition, and operational improvements may still see token declines during periods of negative sector sentiment. Patient capital may be rewarded as market perceptions eventually align with fundamentals.

Third, the timeline for profitability in network businesses is measured in years or decades, not quarters. Expecting DePIN projects to achieve sustainable positive cash flow quickly is inconsistent with precedent from analogous traditional technology companies. Long-term conviction is necessary for successful DePIN investment.

Quality Metrics for DePIN Evaluation

The conversation suggests several metrics that observers should use when evaluating DePIN projects beyond token price. Revenue generation provides the clearest signal of genuine market demand. Sales cycle duration indicates market maturity and customer readiness. Customer contract expansion demonstrates product satisfaction. Geographic coverage shows network growth and utility. And cost efficiency improvements signal operational progress.

These fundamentals-focused metrics contrast with the speculative indicators that often dominate crypto market analysis—social media sentiment, influencer endorsements, and short-term price momentum. While speculative factors certainly influence near-term price movements, they provide limited insight into long-term project viability.

Seidman's emphasis on business fundamentals reflects a perspective shaped by building actual infrastructure rather than trading tokens. This operator mindset prioritizes sustainable value creation over short-term market performance, a orientation that may serve DePIN projects well as the sector continues to mature.

The Future of Decentralized Physical Infrastructure

Despite current market challenges, the underlying thesis for DePIN remains compelling. Physical infrastructure that requires broad geographic distribution faces genuine coordination problems that centralized approaches struggle to solve. Token-based incentive mechanisms offer a potentially powerful alternative for bootstrapping and maintaining such networks.

The success of projects like Hivemapper and Helium in achieving real-world scale and commercial traction validates the basic DePIN concept even if market valuations don't currently reflect this progress. As these networks continue to grow and demonstrate sustained utility, their example may attract additional builders and capital to the sector.

Seidman's optimism about the sector's trajectory, despite acknowledging current difficulties, reflects confidence in the fundamental value being created: "I think we'll pull out of it as people start to realize, oh geez, these things are building real businesses and they're good businesses."

Building for the Long Term

The emphasis throughout the conversation on long-term business building over short-term token performance reflects a mature approach to DePIN development. Projects that optimize for token price rather than operational excellence may see short-term gains but typically fail to build sustainable value.

This long-term orientation requires teams to maintain conviction through periods of market adversity. The "uncomfortable phase" Seidman described tests the resolve of builders and stakeholders alike. Those who maintain focus on core product development, customer acquisition, and network growth position themselves for success when sentiment eventually shifts.

For the DePIN sector broadly, this period of maturation and consolidation may ultimately prove beneficial. The exit of speculative projects and the survival of genuine infrastructure networks will clarify what DePIN actually represents and restore credibility to the term.

Conclusion: The Real Promise of DePIN

Ariel Seidman's commentary on the state of DePIN offers valuable perspective at a critical juncture for the sector. The distinction between genuine physical infrastructure networks and projects merely adopting the label provides essential clarity for observers. The disconnect between business fundamentals and token prices challenges oversimplified narratives about tokenomics. And the comparison to long development cycles at companies like Uber sets appropriate expectations for the path to profitability.

For Solana specifically, hosting leading DePIN projects like Hivemapper demonstrates the blockchain's capability to support high-volume, real-world applications. As these networks continue to scale and achieve commercial success, they provide concrete evidence of Solana's value proposition for enterprise applications.

The DePIN sector faces real challenges—skeptical markets, diluted terminology, and extended timelines to profitability. But for projects genuinely building decentralized physical infrastructure with demonstrable customer value, the long-term opportunity remains significant. The networks that emerge from the current maturation phase will have proven their resilience and established foundations for sustained growth.

As Seidman noted, this is indeed an uncomfortable phase for market participants. But discomfort in the short term often accompanies value creation in the long term. The projects focused on building real businesses rather than managing token prices are likely to define what DePIN becomes as the sector continues to evolve.

Facts + Figures

• Hivemapper's Bee device has reduced mapping costs by approximately 90%, representing a dramatic improvement in network economics that directly impacts AWS bills and overall cost structure.

• Only three genuine DePIN projects were identified by Seidman: Geodnet (positioning technology), Helium (wireless infrastructure), and Hivemapper (decentralized mapping).

• Hivemapper's sales cycle has compressed from 6-9 months to 30-60 days, indicating significantly improved market readiness and customer familiarity with the product.

• Helium serves over one million customers daily through its WiFi wireless product, demonstrating real product-market fit with major carriers like AT&T and T-Mobile.

• Helium generates tens of millions of dollars in annual revenue, establishing it as a genuine revenue-generating business rather than a speculative asset.

• Uber took approximately 10-15 years to generate meaningful positive cash flow, providing a benchmark timeline for network businesses to achieve profitability.

• Both Hivemapper and Helium have seen significant token price declines despite improving business fundamentals, highlighting the disconnect between market performance and operational progress.

• Hivemapper's tokenomics have not materially changed between when tokens traded at 15-20 cents and current levels, challenging narratives that attribute price declines to tokenomic design.

• Existing Hivemapper customer contracts are expanding, with clients allocating increasing budget to network products over time.

• The DePIN sector has experienced oversaturation with many projects launching that don't genuinely require decentralized physical infrastructure.

• Geographic coverage at Hivemapper has expanded significantly over the past year, improving the network's utility to customers.

• Traditional crypto and equity markets are converging, with platforms like Robinhood blurring the distinction between different investor bases.

• Some DePIN projects are considering transitioning from token-based to equity-based capital structures as networks reach scale, though Hivemapper considers this premature.

• True DePIN requires broad geographic distribution of physical infrastructure, distinguishing it from virtual infrastructure projects that can be concentrated in data centers.

Questions Answered

What actually qualifies as a true DePIN project?

True DePIN projects require broad geographic distribution of physical infrastructure across diverse locations. According to Hivemapper CEO Ariel Seidman, genuine DePIN networks need hardware deployed in countless specific geographic areas—neighborhoods, cities, and regions worldwide—rather than concentrated server infrastructure. He identifies only three clear examples: Geodnet for positioning technology, Helium for wireless infrastructure, and Hivemapper for decentralized mapping. Projects that simply require server capacity, regardless of location, don't face the same coordination challenges that define authentic DePIN networks and shouldn't be categorized as such.

Why are DePIN token prices declining despite improving business fundamentals?

Token prices for projects like Hivemapper and Helium have declined significantly even as their businesses have objectively improved across multiple metrics including revenue, customer growth, cost efficiency, and geographic coverage. Seidman attributes this disconnect primarily to market narrative and sector sentiment rather than tokenomic design flaws. The proliferation of questionable projects claiming the DePIN label has created guilt-by-association that affects even legitimate networks. Notably, the tokenomics of these projects haven't changed between when prices were higher and now, suggesting the issue is perception rather than structural. As the market matures and distinguishes real businesses from speculative ventures, this gap may close.

How long should DePIN projects take to become profitable?

DePIN networks should be evaluated on timelines similar to other network businesses, which historically take many years to achieve sustainable profitability. Seidman compared the DePIN trajectory to Uber, which took approximately 10-15 years before generating meaningful positive cash flow despite reaching massive scale. The current phase of DePIN development represents the early stages of network growth, with projects focused on reaching scale, generating initial revenue, and building the foundations for eventual cash flow positive operations. Expecting rapid profitability misunderstands the nature of network business development and sets unrealistic expectations.

What improvements has Hivemapper achieved in its business operations?

Hivemapper has seen dramatic operational improvements over the past 18 months across multiple dimensions. Their Bee device has reduced mapping costs by approximately 90%, significantly lowering AWS bills and overall cost structure. Sales cycles have compressed from 6-9 months to just 30-60 days, indicating much faster customer acquisition. Existing customer contracts are expanding as clients allocate more budget to Hivemapper products. Geographic coverage has expanded substantially, improving the network's utility. These improvements represent genuine business progress that would typically be celebrated in any traditional technology company evaluation.

Could DePIN projects eventually transition from tokens to traditional equity?

There are discussions within the DePIN community about potential transitions from token-based to equity-based capital structures as networks mature. The argument suggests that tokens serve a specific function during the early growth phase—coordinating contributors and distributing ownership—but may become less critical once networks achieve self-sustaining scale. Seidman acknowledged hearing these discussions and noted some projects are considering this path, though he believes it's too early for Hivemapper to make such a decision. The convergence between crypto and traditional markets through platforms like Robinhood is making such transitions more feasible from an investor accessibility standpoint.

What evidence demonstrates that Helium has achieved product-market fit?

Helium has demonstrated clear product-market fit in its WiFi wireless product category through multiple concrete metrics. The network has partnerships with major carriers including AT&T and T-Mobile. Subscriber growth has reached into the hundreds of thousands, with over one million customers being served daily through the network. Helium generates tens of millions of dollars in annual revenue, representing genuine commercial traction rather than speculative activity. These accomplishments indicate that Helium has successfully transitioned from a crypto project to a real business serving actual customer needs at scale.

How does the current market phase affect DePIN development?

The current market environment represents what Seidman called an "uncomfortable phase" characterized by negative sentiment and declining token prices despite improving fundamentals. This period of maturation is actually healthy for the industry as it forces clarity about what actually constitutes DePIN and separates legitimate projects from opportunistic ones. The key for project teams is maintaining operational focus despite external pressure, continuing to build products, serve customers, and grow networks. Projects that sustain execution through this phase will emerge stronger and better positioned when market sentiment eventually improves and perceptions align with business realities.

Why is geographic distribution essential for true DePIN?

Geographic distribution is the defining characteristic that makes DePIN genuinely novel as a coordination mechanism. Traditional centralized approaches can easily aggregate server capacity by deploying hardware in data centers across a few major regions. But physical infrastructure that needs presence in specific geographic locations—every street for mapping, every neighborhood for wireless coverage, every positioning point—faces coordination challenges that centralized companies cannot practically solve through hiring alone. The token-based incentive model allows DePIN networks to coordinate contributors globally without employment relationships, achieving coverage that would be economically impossible through traditional corporate structures.