The Rise Of Crypto's App Ecosystem: Mike Dudas on Venture Capital, Solana, and the Revenue Meta

The cryptocurrency venture landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation. As the industry matures beyond speculative infrastructure plays toward revenue-generating applications, investors are recalibrating their strategies to capture value in an increasingly competitive market. Mike Dudas, Managing Partner at Six Man Ventures, joined the Lightspeed podcast to offer a comprehensive look at how the venture capital playbook is evolving, why Solana's app ecosystem stands at a critical inflection point, and what the broader industry can learn from both its successes and failures.

Top Projects

Lulo

Score: 7,586.13

Bonk

Score: 4,806.12

Sphere

Score: 2,544.42

Moonwalk

Score: 2,026.11

Dudas brings a unique perspective to these discussions. Six Man Ventures, founded in 2021, has positioned itself as one of the top-performing new vintage funds by focusing on the application layer rather than the infrastructure plays that dominated earlier crypto venture cycles. The firm's portfolio includes some of the most consequential consumer-facing protocols in the space, from pump.fun to Magic Eden to Squads, offering Dudas front-row seats to the evolution of how value accrues in decentralized systems.

The conversation ranged widely, touching on the structural problems plaguing token markets, the emergence of liquid token investing as a viable venture strategy, Solana's competitive position relative to Hyperliquid in the perpetuals market, and the complex political dynamics surrounding the Trump family's deepening involvement in cryptocurrency. Throughout, Dudas offered candid assessments of both the opportunities and challenges facing the industry as it navigates regulatory clarity, market structure evolution, and the eternal tension between innovation and speculation.

The Six Man Ventures Origin Story and Investment Philosophy

Six Man Ventures approaches crypto investing with a philosophy that distinguishes it from many peers in the space. Rather than focusing narrowly on consumer applications, Dudas clarified that the firm operates as "app layer investors" across the full spectrum from consumer products to business applications, spanning pre-seed through series investments. This broader mandate has allowed the firm to capture opportunities across multiple verticals while maintaining expertise in areas where value creation has proven most durable.

The firm's track record speaks to the effectiveness of this approach. Dudas highlighted several standout investments that exemplify their thesis. Pump.fun represents perhaps their most dramatic success story, having generated more than $750 million in revenue over the past 14 months while still producing approximately $1.5 million in net revenue per day. The protocol's expansion into pump swap has further diversified its revenue streams, demonstrating the kind of product-market fit that Dudas and his team seek.

Magic Eden illustrates another dimension of their investment philosophy: backing teams capable of evolution. When Six Man first invested, Magic Eden was primarily an NFT marketplace on Solana. The team's ability to pivot and expand into a cross-chain gateway for purchasing both liquid tokens and NFTs across multiple chains showcases the adaptability that characterizes successful crypto companies. "What Magic Eden is today is really a cross chain product, sort of a gateway app to buy anything across any chain," Dudas explained, crediting the founders for their foresight in diversifying the business.

Beyond the consumer speculation vertical, Six Man has built significant exposure to the stablecoin infrastructure space. Their investment in Squads—which Dudas describes as "the Safe of Solana but really growing to be much more"—has evolved from a simple multisig wallet into a full-stack financial services company. The protocol now offers treasury management, wallet services, and is moving into business banking, representing the kind of horizontal expansion that creates durable competitive advantages.

Dakota represents another strategic stablecoin investment, addressing a critical pain point for crypto-native businesses. Founded by former Coinbase and Anchorage executives, Dakota provides banking services for companies like pump.fun that hold tens to hundreds of millions of dollars but face significant challenges accessing traditional banking services. The company bridges on-chain activity with the fiat world, solving a real problem that affects virtually every successful crypto company.

The Revenue Meta: From Meme to Movement

Perhaps no phrase better captures the current zeitgeist in crypto investing than "revenue meta." Dudas acknowledged the term's almost ironic quality—it sounds like it could be either serious or satirical—yet the underlying shift it represents is anything but trivial. "There's just only so long that people are going to value unused block space and DA layers in the billions of dollars," he observed, capturing the essence of a market correction that has been years in the making.

The evolution toward revenue-focused investing represents a maturation of the crypto venture market. During previous cycles, capital flowed readily into infrastructure projects promising future utility, with valuations often disconnected from any measurable economic activity. The current environment demands more. Investors are increasingly drawn to protocols that generate real revenue and demonstrate clear paths to distributing value to token holders through mechanisms like buybacks and fee sharing.

Dudas pointed to Hyperliquid as the paradigm case for this new reality. The protocol generates hundreds of millions of dollars in annualized revenue—potentially approaching a billion dollars—and rather than keeping all value for insiders, implements buyback and burn mechanisms that benefit token holders. This alignment between protocol success and token holder value creation represents the kind of model that Dudas believes will increasingly define successful crypto investments.

The contrast with the previous era couldn't be starker. Where once investors would fund ambitious visions backed by whitepapers and promises, the market now demands evidence of product-market fit, sustainable unit economics, and clear value accrual mechanisms. This shift has profound implications for how capital gets allocated, which projects get funded, and ultimately what kinds of applications get built on public blockchains.

On the equity side, a parallel phenomenon has emerged with the proliferation of treasury companies holding various crypto assets. While Dudas noted the somewhat absurd endpoint of this trend—"we've gotten to the point where we've got a treasury company for every niche asset in crypto"—he sees the underlying impulse as healthy. The market is searching for vehicles that capture exposure to revenue-generating crypto enterprises, and the experimentation with various structures reflects that demand.

Liquid Token Investing: The New Venture Frontier

One of the most significant strategic shifts Dudas discussed involves the integration of liquid token investing into traditional venture strategies. "If you're going to be a top performing early stage or venture style investor in crypto, unquestionably you're going to have to have muscle that allows you not only to invest in private companies pre-TGE, but you are going to have to start to be able to identify liquid tokens that are trading and either have venture upside while liquid or maybe are in a distress scenario," he explained.

Six Man's own journey into liquid investing came somewhat accidentally. The firm hadn't invested in anything liquid until early 2023, when they began purchasing Solana below $20 on public markets. That position has served them extraordinarily well, demonstrating both the returns available in liquid markets and the faster liquidity timeline that distinguishes crypto from traditional venture investing.

This liquidity dimension matters particularly for crypto-focused limited partners, who tend to have different profiles than traditional venture LPs. Rather than the decade-plus time horizons typical of institutional venture investors, crypto LPs often want to see capital returned much more quickly. Liquid investing solves this problem while also providing optionality that locked-up private positions cannot offer.

The structural problems in private crypto markets further strengthen the case for liquid exposure. Dudas described a market where excessive capital chases a limited set of quality deals, driving valuations to levels that make little economic sense given the lock-up periods venture investors face. A typical private deal might involve a one-to-four-year lock-up, yet prices are often set at levels that assume uninterrupted appreciation—a risky bet in crypto's volatile environment.

For Six Man's next fund, Dudas indicated plans to invest significantly more in liquid markets. The strategy involves identifying tokens with venture-like upside potential during various phases of market cycles, recognizing that a three-to-four-year deployment period will likely encompass multiple cycles and multiple opportunities to capture value. The emergence of protocols with real revenue and clear value distribution mechanisms makes this strategy increasingly viable.

Dudas did offer a word of caution for LPs evaluating funds that operate both private and liquid strategies. The potential for conflicts of interest—whether through adverse selection between vehicles or using liquid positions to mark up private books—creates risks that investors should carefully evaluate. Six Man's approach of housing all strategies within a single fund as a registered investment advisor represents one solution to these structural concerns.

The Token Market's Structural Problems

The conversation turned to the darker underbelly of crypto token markets, where Dudas offered an unflinching assessment of the manipulation and misaligned incentives that plague the space. The Movement Labs scandal represented just one visible example of a broader pattern where insiders systematically extract value from retail investors through sophisticated coordination among teams, investors, market makers, and exchanges.

The typical playbook involves launching tokens at low float and high fully diluted valuations, then selling locked tokens over-the-counter at apparent discounts to the inflated public price. Market makers often have options or side deals that incentivize them to support prices rather than perform their core function of making two-sided markets. Exchanges benefit from higher valuations through percentage-based fees on total volume. Everyone early in the system profits while retail participants absorb losses.

"Basically everybody who's early in the system and sort of high in this pyramid of token launches does have an incentive to have really high prices, high trading volumes," Dudas explained. This systemic alignment of insider interests against retail participants creates a cynical environment that misallocates capital—not just from retail investors, but also from venture funds that support these projects rather than focusing on genuine long-term value creation.

Unfortunately, Dudas expects this dynamic to persist through the current cycle. Projects funded during the 2022-2023 vintage with these playbook-optimized cap tables will continue launching tokens over the next twelve months. The overhang of "junk" projects must work through the system before healthier dynamics can prevail. However, Dudas noted that the early-stage private markets are beginning to change, with fewer of these problematic deals getting funded, suggesting improvement over a two-to-four-year horizon.

The Hyperliquid model offers a counterpoint and potential template for healthier token launches. By taking no venture money and implementing broad launches that include actual users through airdrops and productive token uses like buybacks and fee discounts, protocols can create more sustainable ecosystems. As more successful models emerge without the venture-insider playbook, the broader market may shift toward healthier patterns.

Simple reforms could also help. Dudas suggested obvious improvements like requiring disclosure of market maker arrangements. The lack of such basic transparency standards allows the manipulation to continue largely unchallenged. While crypto markets operate differently than traditional securities markets, some baseline disclosure requirements could significantly improve investor protection without compromising permissionless innovation.

The Case for M&A and IPO Markets

The conversation explored how the development of more robust M&A and IPO markets could address some of crypto's structural problems. Historically, one of the biggest issues with crypto venture investing has been the difficulty of realizing gains outside of token launches. This dynamic pushed many projects toward launching tokens that didn't need tokens, ultimately harming retail investors who purchased these unnecessary assets.

A more active M&A environment would provide alternative exit pathways for private investors, reducing pressure to launch tokens purely for liquidity purposes. Recent transactions support optimism on this front: Stripe's acquisitions of Bridge and Privy demonstrate that major fintechs are willing to pay significant premiums to acquire crypto capabilities. Robinhood's acquisitions of Bitstamp and a Canadian exchange show similar appetite in the trading vertical.

"You're seeing the absolute best fintechs in the world start to seriously expand into blockchains and permissionless networks," Dudas observed. These acquisitions represent early indicators of a broader trend that could accelerate as regulatory clarity improves. Companies that might once have been forced toward token launches may instead find willing acquirers among traditional financial services firms seeking crypto capabilities.

The regulatory environment has shifted dramatically to support these dynamics. The previous administration's hostility toward crypto has given way to active rulemaking at the SEC and CFTC. The likely passage of the Genius Act for stablecoins and ongoing work on market structure legislation will provide the clarity that established institutions need to enter the market confidently. Many of these entrants will prefer acquisitions over internal development, creating exit opportunities for venture-backed companies.

The IPO window has also opened decisively. Circle's public listing exceeded expectations, trading at approximately five to six times its initial offering price. While Dudas expressed some skepticism about the valuation's sustainability over eighteen months given Circle's economics—particularly its revenue sharing arrangement with Coinbase—the successful listing demonstrates strong public market appetite for crypto exposure.

Other major private companies are now openly discussing public listings. Gemini and Kraken appear likely candidates, and Dudas expressed hope that firms like Falcon X and Anchorage, which have been private for six to eight years, will also access public markets. Greater transparency into these businesses' economics would benefit the entire industry by demonstrating the strength of legitimate crypto business models.

The emergence of treasury vehicles represents another dimension of public market development. While the proliferation of me-too vehicles for every niche asset has become somewhat absurd, Dudas expects evolution in this space. Simply holding and staking assets won't provide sufficient differentiation; the best treasury companies will likely begin using their assets more productively, including potentially making acquisitions and participating in the application layer built on top of their holdings.

Solana's App Ecosystem: Challenges and Opportunities

The discussion turned to Solana's position as the current leader in blockchain usage and fee generation. While acknowledging Solana's dominance—"currently the most used blockchain, generating the highest level of revenue and fees at the app layer"—Dudas offered a nuanced assessment of both achievements and areas requiring improvement.

The meme coin phenomenon that has driven much of Solana's recent activity receives criticism from skeptics who dismiss the network as merely "a big casino." Dudas pushed back against this characterization, noting that permissionless networks allow users to choose their activities, and the current patterns reflect genuine market demand. Moreover, the intensive speculation activity has stress-tested and hardened Solana's infrastructure in ways that will benefit more diverse applications over time.

However, Dudas expressed disappointment with Solana's DeFi development. "I would have hoped by this point in June 2025 that Solana DeFi more was happening there," he admitted. The products haven't reached parity with competitors, and critical infrastructure challenges remain unresolved. The most glaring gap involves perpetual trading, where Hyperliquid has captured dominant market share despite extensive efforts by Solana teams.

The perpetuals challenge isn't for lack of trying. Multiple Solana teams have attempted to build competitive perpetual trading venues, but structural limitations around order management, quote provision, and transaction priority have prevented products from working effectively. Market makers cannot quote tight spreads reliably, users face challenges canceling orders and getting desired prices, and the overall trading experience falls short of centralized and Hyperliquid alternatives.

Dudas noted that solving this requires work at multiple layers—the L1 itself, client implementations, and transaction prioritization mechanisms. The good news is that the importance of this challenge has now been recognized at the highest levels of the Solana ecosystem, with significant resources being deployed toward solutions. Progress over the next six to nine months could meaningfully improve Solana's competitive position in the perpetuals vertical.

The broader DeFi ecosystem also needs growth in money markets and capital deployment. While Kamino performs well, the overall amount of capital at work in Solana DeFi needs expansion. This creates a chicken-and-egg dynamic: more useful tokens on Solana would bring more capital, but capital deployment also requires confidence in the underlying infrastructure and available products.

On the optimistic side, stablecoin issuance has grown significantly on Solana during 2025. Multiple businesses now view the network—with its improved stability and low fees—as a viable option for money movement applications. This trend should accelerate over the next six to twelve months, though Dudas noted similar growth will occur across multiple chains rather than being exclusive to Solana.

The DePIN vertical remains a bright spot where Solana hosts many of the best projects: Hivemapper, Helium, IO.net, Dawn Internet, and others. The challenge lies in token economics that translate growing usage into token holder value. As these protocols mature and begin generating meaningful revenue, their tokens should better track underlying product success—but that alignment requires continued refinement of tokenomic designs.

Lessons from Hyperliquid's Success

Hyperliquid's dominance in on-chain perpetual trading offers important lessons for the broader crypto ecosystem. The protocol demonstrates that rejecting traditional venture capital can work spectacularly well when combined with exceptional product execution and user-aligned token distribution.

The numbers are staggering: Hyperliquid has captured approximately ten times the perpetual trading volume of the largest Solana venue (Jupiter), and Jupiter isn't even primarily a perpetuals exchange. Drift, the most notable dedicated Solana perpetuals protocol, trails significantly further behind. This concentration of market share in a single protocol represents both a competitive threat to other ecosystems and a proof-of-concept for alternative development models.

Dudas resisted the comparison between Hyperliquid and pump.fun when considering competitive defensibility. The two businesses have fundamentally different moats. Pump.fun's advantages stem from its position as the standard token issuer, the liquidity that exists immediately post-launch, and an increasingly sophisticated social product through its mobile app. Hyperliquid's advantages relate more to execution quality, infrastructure performance, and first-mover advantage in a specific trading vertical.

Importantly, Dudas argued that leadership in perpetuals historically hasn't been particularly defensible, pointing to dYdX's trajectory as an example. Exchange businesses—whether centralized or decentralized—can support multiple successful competitors. Even if Hyperliquid maintains its dominant position, substantial businesses can be built at positions two through five in the market. The parallel to centralized exchanges is instructive: Binance is massive, but so are Bybit, Coinbase, Kraken, and others.

This perspective suggests that Solana's push to develop competitive perpetual products isn't a trap but rather a strategic necessity. The perpetuals market is likely to grow ten to one hundred times its current size. Even capturing a minority share of that expanded market represents an enormous business opportunity. The key is building products that work reliably rather than merely copying Hyperliquid's feature set.

The composability arguments for Solana-native perpetuals also matter. Users who hold assets and participate in other Solana DeFi activities benefit from seamless integration—borrowing against positions, deploying capital across protocols, and managing risk holistically. This creates organic demand for Solana perpetual venues even if Hyperliquid remains the highest-volume option for dedicated traders.

The Pump.fun ICO: A New Paradigm for Token Launches

Discussion of pump.fun's reported plans to raise up to $1 billion at a $4 billion valuation through an ICO-style mechanism generated significant interest. This approach represents a departure from typical token launch patterns and potentially signals broader shifts in how successful protocols access capital and distribute ownership.

Dudas noted that the ICO model isn't entirely novel—Jupiter's sale of JUP into a pool in exchange for USDC represented a similar capital-raising mechanism that generated hundreds of millions of dollars. The difference lies in scale and timing. Pump.fun has achieved clear product-market fit and seeks capital to expand beyond crypto-native audiences into mainstream consumer markets.

The strategic rationale is straightforward. Building products that reach hundreds of millions of users—as opposed to the relatively small crypto-native test audience—requires substantial capital for customer acquisition, creator partnerships, and product development. Centralized exchanges maintain billions of dollars on their balance sheets precisely because these activities demand significant resources.

Pump.fun's expansion strategy is already visible in their product development. The mobile app has improved dramatically, incorporating chat features, early signal token trading, and functionality that directly competes with Telegram for attention. The company views itself less as a crypto product than as a social product with integrated speculation—similar to how sports betting combines content consumption with wagering on FanDuel.

Dudas praised the reported plan to offer public participants the same terms available to private investors. This alignment between public and private access represents a significant improvement over typical token launches where retail participants buy at substantial premiums to insider prices. The approach aligns with emerging platforms like Echo that tout similar parity in access.

While Dudas couldn't comment specifically on airdrop plans, he noted that the pump.fun founders are "really, really savvy" and can be expected to reward loyal users who helped build the platform. Some form of revenue sharing or fee rebates for token holders seems likely, similar to how exchange tokens like BNB function. This creates the kind of aligned incentives that web2 social companies struggle to replicate.

The capital raise also opens strategic possibilities beyond organic growth. With significant treasury resources, pump.fun could pursue M&A, adding capabilities and talent through acquisition rather than building everything internally. This optionality represents another advantage of accessing substantial capital at scale.

Circle IPO and the Opening Public Market Window

Circle's successful public listing marks a watershed moment for crypto companies seeking public market access. The stock's performance—trading at approximately five to six times its IPO price—exceeded most expectations and demonstrated robust public market appetite for crypto exposure.

However, Dudas offered a measured assessment of the valuation's sustainability. Circle's economics face structural challenges, particularly the revenue sharing arrangement that gives Coinbase approximately 50% of interest income generated on USDC. If volumes are heavy on Coinbase, Circle's share may be even smaller. These dynamics create headwinds even as stablecoin usage grows dramatically.

The optimistic case rests on multiple factors: the massive tailwind of increasing stablecoin adoption, USDC's strong position particularly in Western markets, and the strategic optionality that public company status provides. Access to public capital markets, ability to use stock as acquisition currency, and enhanced brand credibility all create opportunities that weren't available as a private company.

The broader impact extends beyond Circle itself. Other well-positioned crypto companies are now actively discussing public listings. Gemini and Kraken appear to be moving toward public markets, and established firms like Falcon X and Anchorage—private for six to eight years—may finally find attractive windows for going public. This transparency into business economics would benefit the entire industry by demonstrating the strength of legitimate crypto enterprises.

More exotic vehicles are also emerging. The announcement of a Tron-related treasury vehicle, potentially involving Eric Trump in an advisory capacity, illustrates both the creativity and the complexity of the current environment. Dudas noted that Tron actually generates substantial fee revenue, giving its token real economic backing, though he questioned whether such vehicles would trade on fundamentals or as memes.

The key insight is that the public market window is clearly open. Companies that can access it while conditions remain favorable should seriously consider doing so. The combination of regulatory clarity, proven models from Circle's listing, and strong investor appetite creates an unusual alignment of factors that may not persist indefinitely.

Trump, Politics, and Crypto's Future

The conversation concluded with an examination of the Trump family's deepening involvement in cryptocurrency and its implications for the industry. Dudas acknowledged the genuine benefits that have accrued since the change in administration while expressing concern about emerging patterns that could undermine industry legitimacy.

The baseline case for the current administration's positive impact is straightforward. The previous administration pursued an aggressive strategy to marginalize or eliminate crypto in America. The SEC conducted extensive litigation against legitimate companies, and the overall regulatory posture created existential uncertainty. That environment has changed dramatically with the new administration's approach to rulemaking, the cessation of enforcement-by-litigation, and the appointment of crypto-friendly officials across regulatory agencies.

The Trump family's personal participation in crypto started as a net positive. Using the technology, issuing NFTs and tokens, and investing in mining operations demonstrated genuine engagement rather than mere rhetoric. Even World Liberty Financial's positioning as a "gateway to DeFi" represented meaningful participation in the ecosystem.

However, concerning patterns have emerged. The apparent correlation between donations or investments in Trump-associated projects and subsequent favorable treatment raises troubling questions. When investigations are dropped and business relationships announced in close succession to financial flows, the appearance of pay-to-play dynamics becomes difficult to ignore.

"If you're defending that and you're not part of the Trump family being directly enriched by it, take a look in the mirror," Dudas stated bluntly. The industry's long-term health depends on demonstrating that crypto represents genuine innovation rather than a new venue for insider dealing and political corruption.

The Trump family's crypto ventures have also shown questionable judgment in execution. The launch of the Melania token immediately after the Trump token, for example, represented an "unforced error" that damaged both assets' value. This pattern of maximizing short-term extraction rather than building sustainable value creates risks for anyone associated with these projects.

Dudas expressed hope that the Trump-associated projects would focus on delivering quality products. World Liberty Financial's USD1 stablecoin could be high-quality and well-integrated. An app with genuine consumer utility could bring new users to crypto. But achieving these outcomes requires prioritizing product development over announcements and genuine value creation over insider enrichment.

The political dimension also affects legislation directly. Democrats have proposed restrictions on politicians holding crypto assets as part of market structure legislation. This creates negotiation dynamics where reasonable investor protections become entangled with partisan positioning. The optimal outcome—clear regulatory frameworks that protect consumers while enabling innovation—may be harder to achieve if crypto becomes merely another front in political warfare.

The Path Forward for Crypto Venture

The conversation with Mike Dudas painted a picture of an industry at a critical juncture. The structural problems are real: token markets riddled with manipulation, misaligned incentives between insiders and retail participants, and infrastructure gaps that prevent Solana from capturing opportunities in key verticals like perpetual trading.

Yet the optimistic case remains compelling. Revenue-generating protocols are emerging and thriving. Public and M&A markets are opening to provide exit pathways beyond token launches. Regulatory clarity is finally arriving after years of uncertainty. And the underlying technology continues improving, with Solana's app ecosystem demonstrating genuine product-market fit in multiple categories.

For investors, the implications are clear. Pure infrastructure plays without revenue paths face challenging valuations. Liquid token investing deserves serious consideration as a complement to traditional venture strategies. And the emphasis on teams capable of evolution and adaptation—like Magic Eden's pivot from Solana NFTs to cross-chain trading—may matter more than initial product positioning.

For builders, the message centers on fundamentals. Revenue generation isn't optional. Token economics must create genuine alignment between protocol success and holder value. And the bar for competitive products continues rising, particularly in crowded categories where multiple teams pursue similar opportunities.

For the Solana ecosystem specifically, the perpetuals challenge represents both urgent necessity and substantial opportunity. Solving the infrastructure and product challenges that have prevented competitive perpetual trading venues would address one of the most glaring gaps in Solana's DeFi offering. The recognition of this priority at the highest levels of the ecosystem suggests focused attention that could yield results over the coming quarters.

The broader crypto industry faces a test of maturity. Can it move beyond the patterns of insider extraction and retail exploitation that have characterized too many token launches? Can revenue-generating protocols demonstrate sustainable business models that attract institutional capital? Can regulatory engagement produce frameworks that protect consumers while preserving permissionless innovation?

The answers to these questions will determine whether crypto fulfills its potential as transformative financial infrastructure or devolves into a more sophisticated version of the speculation machines that critics describe. Based on the trends Dudas outlined—the revenue meta taking hold, public markets opening, regulatory clarity emerging—there are reasons for optimism. But the path forward requires continued focus on building real value rather than extracting paper gains, and the industry's ultimate trajectory depends on which approach prevails.

Facts + Figures

• Pump.fun revenue: The protocol has generated more than $750 million in revenue over the past 14 months, currently producing approximately $1.5 million in net revenue per day, with even higher gross revenue following the pump swap launch.

• Six Man Ventures founding: The firm was established in 2021 and has become one of the best-performing new vintage crypto venture funds, focusing on app layer investments from pre-seed through series stages.

• Solana liquid investment: Six Man Ventures purchased Solana tokens on public markets below $20 in early 2023, generating substantial returns as the asset appreciated significantly.

• Hyperliquid dominance: The protocol captures approximately 10x the perpetual trading volume of Jupiter (the largest Solana venue) and generates hundreds of millions in annualized revenue, potentially approaching $1 billion.

• Circle IPO performance: The stablecoin issuer's stock trades at approximately 5-6x its initial public offering price, significantly exceeding market expectations.

• Circle-Coinbase economics: Circle shares approximately 50% of its interest revenue from USDC with Coinbase, creating structural challenges for its business model.

• Pump.fun ICO plans: Reports indicate pump.fun is planning to raise up to $1 billion at a $4 billion valuation through an ICO-style token sale, with public participants receiving the same terms as private investors.

• Stripe acquisitions: The payments giant acquired both Bridge and Privy, signaling serious expansion into blockchain and crypto infrastructure.

• Robinhood acquisitions: The trading platform acquired Bitstamp and a Canadian exchange as part of its crypto expansion strategy.

• DePIN ecosystem on Solana: Leading projects include Hivemapper, Helium, IO.net, and Dawn Internet, representing some of the best decentralized physical infrastructure networks in crypto.

• Stablecoin legislation: The Genius Act for stablecoins is reportedly on the cusp of passage, with market structure legislation expected later in 2025.

• Private market lock-ups: Typical venture deals in crypto include lock-up periods ranging from one to four years, creating mismatches between price points and liquidity timing.

• Treasury company proliferation: The market has developed treasury vehicles for virtually every niche crypto asset, though Dudas expects these companies will need to become more productive beyond simply holding assets.

• Venture deal velocity slowdown: Both crypto and general tech have experienced significant slowdowns in the velocity of venture deals over the past couple of years.

Questions Answered

What is the "revenue meta" in crypto and why does it matter?

The revenue meta refers to the current market emphasis on protocols and tokens that generate real revenue rather than speculative infrastructure plays. This represents a fundamental shift from previous cycles where unused block space and data availability layers commanded billions in valuations despite minimal economic activity. Six Man Ventures partner Mike Dudas explained that this trend has been building for some time, with investors increasingly demanding evidence of product-market fit and sustainable unit economics before committing capital. The shift matters because it redirects capital toward projects that create genuine value while making it harder for projects relying purely on hype and insider extraction to attract funding. Protocols like Hyperliquid and pump.fun exemplify this new standard, generating hundreds of millions in revenue and demonstrating clear value accrual to token holders through mechanisms like buybacks.

Why are crypto VCs becoming liquid token investors?

Crypto venture capitalists are increasingly incorporating liquid token investments because private market dynamics have become challenging and liquid markets offer attractive opportunities. Dudas explained that excessive capital competing for limited quality deals has driven private valuations to levels that don't make economic sense given the lock-up periods of one to four years that venture investors typically face. Meanwhile, liquid markets occasionally offer tokens with venture-like upside potential, particularly in distress scenarios or when quality protocols are trading below fair value. Additionally, crypto LPs generally want faster returns than traditional venture LPs, making the quicker liquidity available from public market positions appealing. Six Man Ventures plans to significantly increase liquid allocations in future funds, recognizing that top-performing crypto investors will need capabilities across both private and public markets.

What are the main problems with crypto token markets today?

Token markets suffer from systematic manipulation and misaligned incentives that benefit insiders at the expense of retail participants. The typical problematic playbook involves launching tokens at low float and high fully diluted valuations, with market makers often having options or side deals that incentivize them to support prices rather than make genuine two-sided markets. Teams and investors then sell locked tokens over-the-counter at "discounts" to inflated public prices, extracting enormous value. Exchanges benefit from higher prices through percentage-based fees. Dudas expects these dynamics to persist through the current cycle as projects funded in 2022-2023 with these structures continue launching tokens, though he noted that early-stage markets are beginning to fund fewer such problematic deals.

Why is Solana struggling with perpetual trading products?

Solana's challenges in perpetual trading stem from infrastructure limitations rather than lack of effort. Multiple teams have attempted to build competitive perpetual trading venues on Solana, but structural issues around order management, quote provision, and transaction priority have prevented products from matching Hyperliquid's quality. Market makers cannot reliably quote tight spreads, users face challenges canceling orders and getting desired prices, and the overall experience falls short of alternatives. Solving this requires work at the L1 level, client implementations, and transaction prioritization mechanisms. The good news is that Solana ecosystem leaders have recognized this priority and are deploying significant resources toward solutions, with potential improvements expected over the next six to nine months.

What makes the pump.fun ICO approach different from typical token launches?

The pump.fun ICO reportedly offers public participants the same terms available to private investors, representing a significant departure from typical launches where retail buyers pay substantial premiums to insider prices. This alignment between public and private access follows the model Jupiter established when raising capital by selling JUP tokens into a pool for USDC. The strategic rationale involves raising substantial capital—potentially up to $1 billion—to expand beyond crypto-native users into mainstream consumer markets, fund customer acquisition, and pursue potential M&A opportunities. Dudas praised the approach as "very forward looking" and noted that the pump.fun founders are savvy operators likely to implement additional mechanisms like revenue sharing to reward loyal users.

Is Trump good or bad for crypto?

The Trump administration has delivered genuine benefits for crypto by ending the previous administration's hostility, stopping enforcement-by-litigation at the SEC, and advancing regulatory clarity through potential legislation like the Genius Act. However, the Trump family's personal involvement has become increasingly concerning as apparent pay-to-play dynamics emerge, with the appearance of correlations between investments in Trump-associated projects and favorable treatment. Dudas stated bluntly that defending these patterns if you're not benefiting directly requires looking in the mirror. The optimal outcome would involve the Trump-associated ventures actually delivering quality products that bring new users to crypto, but the pattern so far has emphasized announcements and extraction over product development.

Why is the IPO window important for crypto companies?

The opening IPO window provides crypto companies with access to public capital markets, the ability to use stock as acquisition currency, enhanced brand credibility, and transparency that benefits the entire industry. Circle's successful listing—trading at 5-6x its IPO price—demonstrated strong public market appetite for crypto exposure and created a template for other companies. Well-positioned firms like Gemini, Kraken, Falcon X, and Anchorage may now find attractive windows for public listings. The broader impact includes validating business models, increasing transparency into crypto company economics, and providing investors with regulated exposure to the space beyond direct token ownership.

How should investors evaluate funds